A Banner for Conservatism

Rove Free.

2006-06-13T15:06:00.000-07:00

Again, I haven't posted in a long time (sorry). But I felt I should post about this one. So Karl Rove finally go set free today, after all the ludicrous accusations we finally get to be ride of all this foolishness. It's a god day for all of us (well, except the liberals of course).

It was also pretty funny when they took the press up to Camp David just to tell them that the president was in Iraq to greet the Prime Minister. That was just brilliant.

Poem

2006-05-16T10:21:00.000-07:00

There is a great poem up about immigration on weneedafence.blogspot.com all who are interested should check it out.

Immigration

2006-04-15T08:25:00.000-07:00

Okay, I have been putting off talking about this immigration thing. I guess I just didn't think it would come to such big of an argument; I mean, these people broke the law, a law meant to protect the country, why is there a debate? I guess it's just about votes and not doing what's right.

Heres the bottom line: These people broke the law, people are not allowed to do that. I truly am sorry for some of the people, and I'm not against some form of program to help them, but I do not support just letting them live here without anything how long there here for or why they came

The Dawkins Disease

2006-04-10T09:44:00.000-07:00

Richard Dawkins is an evolutionist propagandizer. He has been vehemently opposed to creationism, and religion in general specifically Christianity. Over the past few years Dawkins has been increasingly open about referring to religion as a disease. He has called it a virus that gets past down from generation to generation. He believes that religion is the cause of everything wrong with the world, which is indeed ironic since anyone who knows history can track societal downfall to the rise of atheism and liberalism in our culture.

Dawkins has also suggested that teaching children about the bible is "child abuse", to say the least this is disturbing. In many ways I consider Dawkins to one of the most evil, dangerous men on the planet, but most of all I consider him an insufferable hypocrite. He has supported giving great apes human rights but wants to deny even the most basic ones to humans. He has called the fact that evolution creates a moral vacuum "tough" and yet accuses religion of being barbaric. And this is the kind of man we should listen to when it comes yo scientific matters?

The fact is my friends, it's time to sink or swim, choose to fight for Biblical values and beliefs in our culture or loose them entirely. Shall we let Dawkins and his kind destroy the world and this nation (which will happen, believe me)? I for one have chosen to fight in any way I can.

Us christians have a saying, that for such a time as this we were placed here, I believe this is our time. We have to take back our culture, all of it, not leaving any stronghold of the enemy, not the courts, not science classrooms or public schools, nothing. I believe we are at a crossroad; we either take back the culture for christ or let it fall to evil, that is our choice.

Yet Another Template

2006-04-09T16:26:00.000-07:00

Ok, this is about the fifth time I have changed my template since the formation of this blog six months ago. The old one just had to go, it was just too boring. I think the purpose behind using that one was that I wanted it to look sort of news-headline-ish obviously it didn't work out. So, in honor of our half a year mark I have decided to change. The blog has also gone through several name changes during that time.

So to the few of you who read this blog, happy six month anniversary!

Port Deal

2006-03-02T07:18:00.000-08:00

I know this is my first post in VERY long time. I promise that I will try to post more frequently in the future.

I am posting today about the port deal with the United Arab Emirates (from here on out UAE). I'm sure you all know the situation, the UAE is trying to buy a few of our ports and now people from both sides of the political spectrum are getting all up-tight about it.

I suppose my position on this may be somewhat surprising. You see, I don't see much of a problem with this. As i understand it we still control the ports, they just get the profit from them. Also, it seems like a lot of money for them to send just to try to blow us up. I mean, they already own ports in many other countries, they could just ship bombs to from there.

I don't know, maybe it's just me, but I don't feel that threatened by this.

P.S. This actually isn't a new story, it's been out for at least a month, but been largely ignored.

Canada: Back On The Right Track (Pun Intended)

2006-01-24T16:31:00.000-08:00

After thirteen years of liberal rule, Canada has elected conservative Stephen Harper. This of course raises a pivotal question: Where are the liberals going to flock too next time they lose an election?

But seriously, I was shocked. I had just heard last week that there was even a chance that the conservatives could take power in Canada again (I don't really keep up with Canadian news). To say the least, I was skeptical. Heres a country that (for as long as I can remember) As been the central hub of liberalism in north America. This is the place where liberalism rules. Where lions lay with lambs and where there is peace on earth and good will towards all minority's. These are the people who look down there long and squeaky clean noses at us uncivilized Americans, with our death penalty and our rich people.

Well, apparently the Canadians have had enough of that. Enough of high taxes, and liberal imperialism. Conservatism, is like an infectious disease (one of the few that is good for you) that races across the lands of all those who have lived without it. A nation can only be liberal for so long, before it's people get fed up with it.

The First Day Of Biology Class 2015

2006-01-04T13:19:00.000-08:00

I recently came across an article at Answers in Genesis. It's very funny but also serious. This article shows where science may really be going (but perhaps not in such a pronounced way).

Enjoy!!!

"Welcome to your federally mandated biology class—“The Evolution of You by Way of the Zoo.” I am Miss Lead, I have a B.S. degree in “Evolutionary Indoctrination” and I will be your learning facilitator.

I especially want to welcome you students who are new to our Federal schools. I know that this has been a trying year for many of you and your families, but as you know, the Supreme Court has declared that home schooling and all explicitly Christian schools are prohibited by law and that you must now attend a federally controlled school. I thank you for your willing cooperation. It is regrettable that some children had to be forcibly taken away from their uncooperative parents, but the Court has decreed that it is the State, not the parents, who are primarily responsible for their education.

It is required by law that we spend our first class period advising you of the legal rules and regulations governing both the definition of science and impermissible thoughts in the science classroom. As your facilitator, I myself must follow these regulations to remain on the federal payroll, and you must follow them to avoid being sent for mental deprogramming. So listen up! It is no fun having your memory banks reset to that of an artichoke.

First we will consider the legally mandated definition of science: The Supreme Court has declared that “Science is the study of everything in the cosmos that is real and involves the effort to explain the origin of all real things in exclusively materialistic terms.” The Court has defined the “cosmos” (i.e., material universe) in terms of Sagan’s law—“The cosmos is all there is, all there ever was, and all there ever will be.” Please note that the Court has left the entire realm of things that are unreal to the exclusive domain of the church. In this way that impregnable “wall of separation” between church and state, so wisely mandated by the framers of our Constitution, is not breached.

Next we must consider the two laws of “Unthinkable Thought” which prohibit certain thoughts and speech in the science classroom. To enforce these laws, the courts require that all classroom instruction and discussion in science be recorded for analysis on videotape and that all teachers and students submit to lie detector questioning by Federal Thought Police. Those failing such tests will be given one more chance to abandon their unthinkable thoughts before being subjected to deprogramming.

In the “First Law of Unthinkable Thought,” the courts have declared that “no student or teacher will be permitted to think, much less articulate, any thought that dares to question the dictates of evolutionary dogma.” While critical thinking and a questioning mind are essential to all fields of empirical science, such is not the case for evolutionism. The courts have found that atheists and “skeptics” never question the fact of evolution, while most criticisms of evolution, no matter how valid or scientific they might be, come from suspected “stealth” religionists and thus constitute the teaching of religion.

The “Second Law of Unthinkable Thought” (best known as the “Anti-Intelligence law”) declares that “no teacher or student will be permitted to think, much less articulate, any thought that something in nature is too complex and integrated to have been formed by random chance processes and to suggest instead that it reflects intelligent design or, God forbid, a divine Creator.” Educators have found that most students tend to think of the possibility of intelligent design when teachers give insightful, substantive and enthusiastic lectures on complex biological systems. Thus the law now requires that biology teachers must give superficial and boring lectures laced with evolutionary speculation on organs such as the eye, lest students be led astray by their intuitive recognition of intelligent design.

But, “why” you might ask (but dare not) have the courts passed such draconian laws governing our very thoughts in the science classroom? The answer is really quite obvious. For years evolutionary dogma has been taught extensively in almost every class from first grade on, but surveys have shown that most students still fail to believe in evolutionism. Professional educators are amazed that even further increasing the quantity and intensity of evolutionary indoctrination has proven unsuccessful in producing true believers! Even worse, these unbelievers seem to have no difficulty in feeding back to us the required correct answers to evolutionary questions on examinations—indeed they seem to perform better than the true believers!

Surely you can see that it was time for the courts to intervene and require actual belief in evolutionism and not just indoctrination. The very survival of America, indeed the survival of the world as we know it, depends on it! After all, Dobzhansky’s law declares that: “nothing in biology makes sense without evolution.” If students do not truly believe in evolutionism, it is a proven fact that they will be totally incapable of pursuing any field requiring scientific understanding. Thus they will be completely unsuitable as teachers, researchers, physicians, nurses, engineers, geologists, astronomers, farmers, lawyers, parents, news reporters, talk show hosts and popular entertainers.

Finally I will remind you that a federally mandated sticker known as the “revised Cobb County sticker” has been permanently affixed on the inside cover of your biology textbook declaring:

“This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a fact, not a theory, regarding the origin of living things. This material must be approached with a closed mind, studied superficially, and uncritically accepted.”

You are required by law to memorize this sticker and repeat it as a confession of faith before meals and each time you open and close the book.

Rest assured that all these laws forbidding unthinkable thoughts and requiring unquestioning belief in crass materialism and evolutionism have received the enthusiastic support of almost all the professional educational, legal and human rights organizations as well as from distinguished people of faith from nearly all of the major Christian denominations and seminary schools. Now, if we are all willing to comply (and of course, you are), let's get started!"

While I believe this to be a little bit exaggerated to make a point, it does have many valid points (much of this is already happening today). This Is the danger of being closed minded in science.

Biblical Archeological evidence.

2005-12-31T15:04:00.000-08:00

When I am discussing recent archeological evidence with those who do not believe in the holy word of God, I often get flack when I talk about recent archeological evidence. People who of course know it all are quick to dismiss things like the Red Sea crossing as mere fiction. The reason being that they have been told by a skeptical community that there is no evidence for such an event.

One of the things they love to do is point out that in the traditional locations of biblical events there is often little to no evidence that says that such things ever happened. What they fail to do is make a distinction between the biblical account of things that happen and the modern day interpretations of what happened.

I mentioned the Red Sea crossing earlier, this is what is generally considered the best evidence against the biblical account. But did the Exodus really happen? Did Egypt really get destroyed by plagues? Did the waters of the Red sea really open up before them? Did they really live at Mt. Sinai? Is there any evidence for this? I (and many others with me) believe the answer is undeniably "yes".

Starways says

"A papyrus dating from the end of the Old Kingdom was found in the early 19th century in Egypt [6]. It seems to be an eyewitness account of the events preceding the dissolution of the Old Kingdom. Its author, an Egyptian named Ipuwer, writes:
• Plague is throughout the land. Blood is everywhere.
• The river is blood.
• That is our water! That is our happiness! What shall we do in respect thereof? All is ruin!
• Trees are destroyed.
• No fruit or herbs are found...
• Forsooth, gates, columns and walls are consumed by fire.
• Forsooth, grain has perished on every side.
• The land is not light [dark].

Velikovsky recognized this as an eyewitness account of the ten plagues. Since modern men are not supposed to believe in such things, it has been interpreted figuratively by most historians. The destruction of crops and livestock means an economic depression. The river being blood indicates a breakdown of law an order and a proliferation of violent crime. The lack of light stands for the lack of enlightened leadership. Of course, that's not what it says, but it is more palatable than the alternative, which is that the phenomena described by Ipuwer were literally true.

When the Bible tells us that Egypt would never be the same after the Exodus, it was no exaggeration. With invasions from all directions, virtually all subsequent kings of Egypt were of Ethiopian, Libyan or Asiatic descent. When Chazal tell us that King Solomon was able to marry Pharaoh's daughter despite the ban on marrying Egyptian converts until they have been Jewish for three generations because she was not of the original Egyptian nation, there is no reason to be surprised."

Although I have not done much research into this particular piece of evidence I believe it to be rather interesting, especially since it seems to mirror the biblical account quite well.

"But is this the only piece of evidence you have?" you may ask. My friends, this isn't even the tip of the iceberg.

Since I don't really have time go into all the evidence (which is a lot, let me tell you) personally, I have to decided to give a brief sum up of what has been found. I will also give you links to resources that you can use to find out more.

The Exodus

1) Traditional Red Sea crossing sites are in small lakes, or in gulf of Suez (the first "arm" of the Red sea). Most historians laugh at the fact that there is no evidence that the Israelites crossed near here. They may, however, be surprised to learn that there is no biblical basis for the israelites crossing in these places.

2) The bible clearly states that the israelites traveled out of Egypt. All of those locations were located inside of egypt. Therefore, the only plausible location for the Red sea crossing is the gulf of Aqaba (the second "arm" of the Red sea). But is there any proof? Yes.

3) The gulf of Aqaba is comparable to a huge canyon, it is incredibly steep on all sides. However, at the proposed crossing sites (there are two in the gulf of Aqaba, and this applies to both) there is a land bridge that stretches all the way across.

4) Not only this but the location matches the biblical account of being hemmed in by the wilderness almost exactly.

5) But our tale is not done yet, while diving in this region archeologist discovered choral. "Well, there is nothing special about that" you say. Perhaps, but remember that choral will only latch on to certain types of objects, it will not hold on to sand or plant life. Moreover this choral does not match any of the other types of choral found in the area. It is not confined to a specific place, it is strewn out in hundreds of fragment on the bottom of the sea. This choral appears to have the shape of man made objects. Specifically, parts of chariots that are similar to those found in King Tuts Tomb. This is only strengthened by the fact that they found pieces of chariots that were not completely covered in choral, including one piece that (because of it's material) had not been covered at all.

Mt. Sinai

1) If the Red sea crossing site is in the gulf of Aqaba than the traditional Mt. Sinai (in the Sinai peninsula) cannot be the correct location. Many scholars believe Mt. Sinai to be in present day Saudi Arabia, or biblical Median (the land that moses is said to have fled to, and encountered the burning bush). This is supported by many Jewish historians, including St. Paul and Josephus. But again, is there any evidence? If your an Atheist or Agnostic, prepare to have your skepticism rocked.

2) A few years back, two explorers who had received a letter from astronaut and explorer Jim Irwin, the eighth man on the moon. It described a mountain in Arabia which could be Mt. Sinai. The mountain was called Jebel el lawz

3) After getting into the country (illegally, which both men regret) they crossed the gulf of Aqaba and went in search of the mountain.

4) They found several caves which were roped off by the country's government for archeological reasons. Inquiring of one of the archeologists they discovered that they had found inscriptions in these caves which state that Moses (the man used the arabic word) had come through that area with his nation of people.

5) there also is a strong local tradition that this is true, along with a tradition that the mountain they were headed to was Mt. Sinai. Keep in mind these locals have no religious reason for believing this.

6) Once at the mountain they discovered that it was roped off by the Arabian government. It was heavily guarded for obvious reasons (being that if this truly is Mt. Sinai it is one of the Jews most holy sites on Muslim land).

7) From outside the gate they could see a large stone mound in the shape of an alter. This alter (if indeed it is one) had carvings of an Egyptian bull god etched into the stone. This is out in the middle of the arabian desert there would be no reason for anyone to go out and forge these type of carvings there. This is consistent with the biblical account.

8) They knew they had to get on the mountain, so after about ten at night they began to trek up the mountain.

9) they came across a large stone (able to be seen from miles away) that was split from top to bottom; the rock underneath this stone was eroded away (keep in mind that this is granite rock, it would take millions of gallons of water, presumably flowing from the rock, since it appears to be the source, to make this type of erosion; this coming naturally from a country that gets about a half an inch of) rain every ten years is extremely unlikely).

10) But where did all this water go? they found evidence that this water flowed into a huge stretch of land, providing the israelites with a lake with which they could take water.

11) According to the bible Elijah fled to Mt. Sinai and lived in a cave. The traditional site has no such cave, nor do the many other sites that have been proposed for Mt. Sinai. This site, however, has just such a cave.

12) Now, heres the really spooky part; when you travel to the top of the mountain it is completely black on top. Now, this could be just volcanic rock, except for one thing. These explorers broke open several of these rocks and guess what? they are granite on the inside. That is, they are melted black outside and granite inside. Now, the bible says that God descended on Mt. Sinai in fire, interesting coincidence wouldn't you say? Interestingly enough this same kind of burned stone is found in a small patch near what is presumed to be the rock of Horeb. The bible also says that God called Moses to the rock of Horeb.

13) This is not all the evidence they found. Basically you name anything that the bible mentions is at Mt. Sinai and it's there. Right down to the markers Moses set up to keep people away from the mountain.

14) If you are inclined to believe that this did not really happen keep in mind that ALL of this evidence is recorded on either photographs and/or home video. These pictures were smuggled out of the country at great risk.

Note: I have seen Some weak reasons as to why this cannot be that site; these are, as I say, weak.

In Search of The Mountain Of God

The Search For The Real Mt. Sinai

The Exodus Revealed: The Search For The Red Sea Crossing

Click Here For Pictures

Merry Christmas

2005-12-24T09:49:00.000-08:00

I am posting for the last time until.... well I don't quite know. Since it is Christmas eve I have decided to wish you all a very merry Christmas. Whatever you believe, whatever your political persuasions may be, I hope your holidays go well. Remembering Christ's birth is what it is all about for me. Why don't you post what Christmas means for you in the comment section (this is open for all, not just members of blogspot).

Have a merry Christmas and a happy new year!,

Oracle.

The Three Kinds of Liberals

2005-12-17T08:15:00.001-08:00

I seem to have raised a few eyebrows with my recent remarks about Liberals being Nazis. I suppose I should probably explain myself better, you see I have a certain philosophy about this I should probably share in order for you to fully understand my reasoning.

In my opinion there are three kinds of liberals in the world. Each is quite different in their motivation for being liberals, but all are a threat to America and it's way of life. These three categories are how I distinguish between the various different types of liberals that I have seen and talked to. They are not entirely original but they are slightly different from other similar lists I have seen. And so here they are:

Honest People who have a soft spot for supposedly liberal causes: This (I believe) is the most common type of Liberal, these are people who care about things like poor people or the environment and have been duped into thinking that liberals care about them and that Conservatives are just a bunch of uncaring buffoons who would rather have oil than a clean earth. Many times such people will be devoted to one specific cause such as women's rights, animal right, environmental preservation, etc, etc, etc; and not be devoted to the liberal movement as a whole. To these people I would say "please examine all the evidence before deciding which side truly cares about such things."

Liberals who believe in the ideas without understanding the consequences: These people (for some reason that I am unable to understand) are true liberals in the sense that they support the politics of the party and believe them to be true. They will often defend their party's politics to the death with the up most certainty that what they say is true. These people, however, rarely stop to think about the consequences of what they believe or do not want to except them. These people make up a good majority of the party's leadership.

The Communists who are posing for the rest:These are the real masterminds behind the whole thing, those who hate the U.S. hate democracy and hate those who know about them. These are often hard to recognize apart from the last group because - in public - they act so very similar to to them. The best time to recognize them is in times when they are being called out for what they are or when something they rely on is about to collapse - such as the liberal judicial system - this is when they come out of the woodwork. I said in the last category that they (the ones in the last category) make up a majority of the party's leadership, while that is true these are the ones you will see getting the most attention, and they will show their communist way of thinking, if you watch them closely. They often will accuse you of questioning their patriotism if you try to point out certain anti-American ideas that they hold, watch for this and do not be thrown off by it. And as has been observed numerous times, quoting them equals attacking them.

There are also a few subgroups to each category but I will not discuss those here. For now just know that the last group were the people I was referring too when I made my comments in those last posts. I stand by what I said and I shall stand by what I say now.

The Nazi Left

2005-11-26T07:02:00.000-08:00

I have known for a long time that the Liberals are Nazi's candy wrapped in a humanitarian shell. They disguise themselves under names like Environmentalist's, Progressives, humanitarian, etc, etc, etc. But those who know them the best know what they really are. I mean think about it, the liberals support everything the Nazi's supported. For example: the liberals hate Jews - no scratch that - they despise Jews. They hate Jews because America is with the Jews (and the liberals hate America most of all) and they can not stand for that. They see the Jews as an oppressing force which has stolen precious land from the Arabs.

And who else hated the Jews? Thats right, the Nazi's.

Thing's that liberals hold close to there heart the Nazi's also held close to there. The killing off of those who are no longer useful is one. But of course thats not what they call it. They call it compassion, or "putting them out of there misery".

And who else was in favor of killing off the useless? Thats right, the Nazi's.

Liberals also try to warp the minds of children so that they follow there wacko ways when they get older. This is most evident in public schools - where liberalism reigns - , they try to destroy any sense of morality so that they can use the now brain dead students for there agendas when they get older.

And once again, who else warped and controlled school children? that is correct, the Nazi's

I could go on and on about this but I think you get the basic idea. The point is that Liberals have much in common with the Nazi's, they are just better at hiding it.

Paris in Flames

2005-11-05T22:05:00.000-08:00

I'm sure most of you have heard about the riots in Paris, from what i've heard it started on Oct. 27, 2005 and has been growing steadily worse ever since. Mostly because of the inefficiency of the French police, and even the military! It is also due to uncontrolled immigration in the area. The chaos has engulfed many of the suburbs in Paris and the surrounding areas.

This all began because of two teenage boys who ran from the police, who they assumed were chasing them. Due to this fact they were unfortunately electrocuted to death; lets just say the rest of the population didn't take to kindly to that. And thus began the Paris riots, a brutal and uncontrolled event from the very beginning. Just some of the things that have happened since the riots started are: nine hundred vehicles burned, a school building was torched until there was little left of it but charred ruble, and several paramedics were stoned while there ambulance was being torched!

Even though the police in the area have been slow to act they have managed to arrest quite a few people, two hundred and fifty since yesterday afternoon. They also have a helicopter in the area chasing down some of the more dangerous rioters. If nothing else this should demonstrate to the French government that they need to crack down on immigration in the country. And it should also demonstrate to us in america that we should be very cautious of illegal immigration; we need to make it clear that we will not tolerate people coming into our country without a green card. Otherwise we may wake up one morning and find that what's happening in Paris, is happening here.

Only time will tell what will become of the citizens of Paris, I certainly hope they pull through, and I shall try to update you as events unfold.

Ditto's To Alito

2005-10-31T17:14:00.000-08:00

I am very happy today. There is not a soul on this planet that could bring me down on such a fine day as this, we finally got a constructionist nominee for the Supreme Court! Amen, the natural order of things has been restored, the liberals are going nuts, isn't it a beautiful thing?

Yes it's official Samuel Alito has been nominated to take a seat on the Supreme Court, with any luck by the end of the year. Unlike Ms. Miers Justice Alito has a long paper trail and more experience than anyone nominated to the Supreme Court in the last 70 years. And as usual the brain dead feminist's and other left wing groups have rallied in protest of the presidents latest pick for the highest Court in the country.

Also, nearly every Democrat Senator has come out in opposition of Alito's nomination; but that's what we want because then we can have a battle based on ideals and not what the trend is in the Washington "mainstream". One of the good things that came out of the Miers nomination is that it scared the rest of our party that has made deals with the political devil before to get there act together, or they will be out of office.

One thing that has been alleged about Alito is that he has gone to easy on several criminals in his years as a prosecutor, including up to twenty Mob members from a particular family. Now, since I do not know anything about the case personally I can not speak on wether or not this is true but with the democrats I very much doubt it. The reason I bring this up is because I have heard this used to suggest that he has connections in the mob, this I know is ridiculous because he later put three of these people away for other things.

I am so happy with the president today, he didn't cave to the pressures of the other side this time because he knew that that's not what he was elected for, he was elected by people who were tired of giving up ground to these idiots who don't know diddle squat about running a good government. So let the good times roll, and let Alito get the seat that he deserves.

For Better Or For Worse?

2005-10-27T18:06:00.000-07:00

Well it's official Harriet Miers has withdrawn from the running for supreme court justice. In some ways I'm disappointed particularly in some members of my own party for giving her such a hard time. I must confess however that in the time since i wrote the "Roe vs Wade" post I have come across some disturbing news about Ms. Mier's views on certain topics.

All in all I think it worked out for the best now those of us on the right can unite behind a justice that we all agree on. I really haven't the faintest idea who the next nominee will be but I think it's safe to say that Bush will probably swing more right this time. It also is good because it crushes any hopes of the Democrats for a Republican brake up.

Well that's al for tonight but I would like to take a moment to remind those in my party that we are still in control and we will get our next nominee confirmed.

The Old, The New, And The Insane.

2005-10-25T18:11:00.000-07:00

Before we get started today I would just like to explain about the knew template, LONG story short something was screwy with the old one so I had to replace it, I hope you don't mind.

Well, sorry again for not having posted in quite a few days, I hate staring at the same old post on my screen every time I check my comments but I have been busy messing around on my other site (see link on the side) but I'm back now and hope to be able to check in more often in the future. But some good did come from my absence I now have a great amount of material for this post!

All right, now that we have those things out of the way lets get down to business, as you most likely know there has been a lot of commotion in the Washington lately, first Delay gets indicted then this ridiculous Lewis and Cheney situation and then to top it off we have untouchable mother Cindy Sheehan threatening to tie herself to the white House unless we bring our troops home. Well, since each of these events deserves a place on my site I shall address them all in turn.

First off the indictment of former house majority leader Tom Delay, although I have never written about it here I have spoken about it on several occasions elsewhere, and I shall say now what I said then this is a ridiculous and completely politicly motivated trial, It's a miracle this thing got past a Grand Jury (which it took five attempts to do) the prosecutor is a sniveling little weasel who will stop at nothing to eliminate threats to his liberal backers. This is why I have a great deal of respect for Delay, I mean this guy has been striped of his title, been personally and professionally dragged through the mud, and been abandoned by many of his own party members and yet he still manages to keep a smile on his face (no pun intended) in short he has been as he said been indicted for "beating Democrats".

Next is this whole CIA leak Dick Cheney and Lewis Libby, again I find this to be a complete wast of time, I mean they search for two years and finally come up with Ah, it's public enemy's number 2 and 3 that did it. There being investigated for allegedly leaking the name of a undercover CIA operative (Valerie Plane) in a conversation, which I find to be perfectly legal even if it is true because they both had clearance to do so. But Wether it is true or not the fact remains that if they are indicted the charges will be rest on speculation, hearsay, and criminalization of politics, all of which of course just suddenly became legal.

The final installment of our analyzation of politics today is the unfortunate story of the untouchable mother Cindy Sheehan, Now, I have as much sympathy for this women as the next person but there gets to be a time when it just gets to be to much, in this case that time was five weeks ago, I mean come on, threatening to strap herself to the White House fence! the only thing that she will effect is the birds. Although I feel sorry for her enough is enough, In case she doesn't know already the only thing that takes her seriously anymore are the mentally unstable (well, granted that could describe three fourths of the Democrat party).

Where's the Oil?

2005-10-21T13:54:00.000-07:00

I was watching the trial of Saddam Hussein this week reminiscing over all that has happened over the last few years. Thinking back to the tragic day when the twin towers fell when this all began, when president Bush gave his "and the people who knocked these buildings down...." speech. Then my mind drifted steadily away to when we first invaded Afghanistan and then Iraq, remembering when we first heard that Saddam had been captured by our armed forces in the mountains, wasn't that exiting? Then my mind shifted away again to the 04 presidential election, Oh what fun that was of course Bush beat that imbecile Kerry in a landslide which some are still in denial about.

So while all this was going on in my head I suddenly started wondering where the oil? I mean isn't that why we went to war in the first place? The evil George Bush was going to kill all the innocent people just so he could steal oil out from right under there nose. Well if that was the reason then where is it? Now I suspect that some of the more militant liberals out there would say that Bush probably just took all of it and stuffed it in his own pocket laughing all the way down the road while the American people suffer under high gas prices. But to some of the more logical thinkers out there who think that maybe just maybe Bush didn't go to war for oil but for (heaven forbid) the reason he said he did i would encourage you to look into it further and see what you find.

I guess well just have to wait and see because no matter how much evidence there is that Bush didn't lie there will always be those who will believe that Bush is the Scum of the earth. So i Guess I will leave you with the words of literary character Sherlock Holmes- "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, However Improbable, must be the truth".

Demacracy On The Move

2005-10-18T18:31:00.000-07:00

Sorry to all faithful readers of this site for not updating in the past couple days. I have been busy lately but I have never wished to be her more. Now to the topic at hand, as most of you know that the Iraqi elections took place earlier this week and (according to all current reports) have been hugely successful. Yes, despite the best efforts of our friends on the left democracy marches on in the middle east, let this be a lesson to all the communist liberals around the globe that you can't stop our president no matter how hard you try he will always prevail because he is on and in the right.

Separation Deception

2005-10-15T05:59:00.000-07:00

Everyone has a pet peeve, something that hits home in a way that nothing else quite does. Those who know me will tell you that mine is the so called "Separation of church and state". I have a personal hatred for this topic because (as those who read this know) I am a christian but moreover I am a conservative Christian. My hatred of this is really two fold and I shall attempt to explain both reasons briefly here. The first reason is that this concept has been twisted so much it's hardly recognizable as what it was originally intended to be. The second is the fact that The people who's hands are doing the twisting are doing so fully aware of what there doing but choosing to look the other way.

Perhaps I should explain what the original intent of this idea was. What is now known as the "separation of church and state" began as one sentence in the First Amendment, it stated "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". If this statement seems a little to short to have been formed into perhaps the most crucial ideal of the courts today your not alone. The original intent of the sentence written above was to insure that what we were rebelling against (which was the king of england dictating how to worship) did not happen in the democratic society they had just founded.

It's ironic then that this same ideal which was meant to stop the oppression of religion is now being used to do just that. Thats why this frustrates me so much, to think that any imperialist judge can just make up laws as they go along is nothing short of frightening. I have decided to take a stand against this, and I hope you will to.

The Sky is Falling!

2005-10-13T06:56:00.000-07:00

This classic line spoken by the children's story book character "chicken little" who was absolutely convinced that the sky was falling and the world was coming to an end all because an egg-corn had fallen from a tree and landed on her head. This is an amusing story but (as any good children's book would) it teaches us a lesson about jumping to conclusions before we have any real proof. This is important because as happened in the story there will always be people who will take the same mediocre evidence and be perfectly happy to follow along without questioning it in any way shape or form.

Im talking of-course about the current situation with global worming. As with the story many so called "expert's" who study global worming are willing to take any untested evidence they can find and tell us we are destroying the globe. Now until recently much of this evidence was taken at face value, but over the last decade or so real scientists have begun to question the traditional views of global worming in favor of more accurate science. People who say we cause global worming should look farther back in history and see that it was much much hotter back in ancient history than it is now. Obviously there were no polluting SUV's or power plants or anything that these scientists accuse of causing this planet's destruction back then.

It seems strange then that we are the sole cause of all of these natural disasters or global worming ( which i seriously question if it is as extreme as we've been led to believe ) is all because us evil polluters who wont dump our cars in the nearest garbage heap. Now obviously we must take care of our planet and make sure not to pollute it as much as we can, but to say that we can make a huge hurricane jump out of the ocean by us going about the activity's of our everyday lives is absolutely ridiculous. As a wise man I know once put it "some people just aren't happy unless the world is coming to an end".

On the battle line.

2005-10-10T06:05:00.000-07:00

It is no secret that those who appose conservative ideals both in politics and in the media try very hard to eliminate anyone with any type of power in the country who does not agree with there form of morality. This can accure on many fronts in almost any way they can think of. It could be as simple as trying to tarnish said persons reputation in order to diminish there effectiveness, or it could be ( if there very lucky ) that they even bring said person up on charges to variing digrees of extremity.

The most recent example of this is the political bombs falling on Dr. James Dobson, chairmen of the "Focus on the Family" institute. He had recently mentioned on a radio program of his that he knew things that he prabobly shouldnt about the knew nominee for supreme court justice Harriet meiers. This riled up the lberal party leaders in a way that we have been seeing more and more since they lost power. Being a regular listener to Dr. Dobson's program I can tell you with a great amount of confedence that though he has many connections in the wight house and may know things that we do not yet know he would never withhold information that would be crucial to the confirmation procces. This atack really isn't as much about Dr. Dobson as it is about President Bush because he had said that he had not had any coversations with justice miers about abortion or about Roe vs. Wade.

This is just another example of liberals atack dogs trying to undermine the president in anyway possible. For as i've already stated this is not about Dr. Dobson or About Justice Meiers this is about Bush and how he always must be wrong and is always lying whenever his moronic conservative lips dare to open. In short what we have here is another sad page in yet another sad chapter of the infamous book of liberal hypocricy.

Fighting for the middle ground

2005-10-09T10:15:00.000-07:00

Recently I have become very aware of a situation among the conservatives. And it is this, that we try far to much to please the other side. I am not the first person to have noted this, in fact it has become something of a hot topic in the conservative media. But I would like to discuss it here because I feel it is Important to the welfare of the republican party.

We have seen this many times over the last few years just a couple of examples are topics such as the terri scivo case or the filibuster debate earier this year. these sort's of compromises are very harmful to our causes. This is really more of a trap than a compromise in truth, we try so hard to get in good with the liberals we forget what's truly important and then were just there tool wich they can bend to there will any time they feel the need.

That is why I send my call across the web to anyone within the sound of my voice, we must not let this continue! It is a discrace to everything we place value on. for if we give up any ground to these people I promise you we won't be getting any back.

The inner working's of a liberals mind.

2005-10-08T10:52:00.000-07:00

I was recentiy visiting my friend's blog ( http://militantleftist.blogspot.com ) in which he was commenting on how to make conservatives angry. Knowing him as I do I was not surprised or particularly angered by this topic. However I was surprised to see that a candidate for the U.S. senate (Steve Moyer) had posted a comment confirming what he was saying.

He was talking about how he used the bible as a tool in his speeches and how he was quoting bible passages about the love of money or about racism to trip up his opponents. This was very disturbing, to think that someone seriously being considered for a position in the U.S. senate would conduct himself in such a manner is almost sickening.

Now obviously the biblical statement's about the love of money or of hate are true and extremely important but to use the biblical word's of truth and twist them for political gain is very unbiblical. I would encourage anyone reading this who is able to vote and is in the state that this man is being elected in to oppose the election of this man and not let him on the senate of this great nation, in this time of moral crisis can we really afford to?

Roe vs. Wade

2005-10-08T07:27:00.000-07:00

With the confirmation of justice Roberts behind us there is hope that imperialistic supreme court ruling's such as Roe vs. Wade will eventually be overturned. However the new candidate for the supreme court (justice Harriet meiers) legal view's are somewhat questionable. Indeed this choice came as a shock to many of us die hard right wingers who would have prefered another John Roberts type. I have mulled over this candidate for a great amount of time (taking in as much information as i possibly could) and have decided to defer to the president's judgement on this. If i find new information that changes my position on this I shall let you know.

Welcome to populus!

2005-10-08T07:04:00.000-07:00

This is the first post here at populus,so it feel's only right to explain what populus is about. Populus is an effert to create a right wing website devoted to truth. Here we shall discuss anything anything that is in contraversy in this country. In the next few weeks we shall discuss such topic's as abortion, gay marriage, death penalty, ect, ect, ect. I hope you have a good time here at populus and look forward to meeting you here soon. For those of you who are wondering populus is a latin word wich means "people" it also is the root word for the english derivatives "popular" and "populated".